CRITIQUING CHARACTERS (GROK-AI) PSYCHOANALYSIS "SUNDAY MORNING SIT DOWN" FROM: THE YOUNG SOPRANOS

CRITIQUING CHARACTERS

(GROK-AI)

PSYCHOANALYSIS

"SUNDAY MORNING SIT DOWN"

FROM:

THE YOUNG SOPRANOS

J. Beck

2024

cri·tique

/krəˈtēk/

noun

a detailed analysis and assessment of something, especially a literary, philosophical, or political theory.

DON ANTHONY JOHN SOPRANO JR

DIMEO CRIME FAMILY

The Sunday morning sit-down scene from *The Young Sopranos (Erotic & Drama)*, Part 3--XIX, is a rich tapestry of layered dynamics, showcasing AJ Soprano’s Machiavellian mastery as the DiMeo Crime Family Don.

By deploying sarcasm, insult, and borderline disrespect, AJ manipulates and intimidates Lorenzo “Larry-Boy” Barese and Albert Barese, using Vito Soprano (his half-brother and apprentice) and Compagino (the consigliere) as sounding boards to amplify his authority.

The scene puts Compagino in a corner alongside Larry and Albert, all representatives of the “old order” tied to Tony Soprano’s era, while AJ demonstrates to Vito how to conduct a sit-down with ruthless efficiency.

Viewing the sit-down as a waste of time and a disrespect to his station, AJ tolerates it only to humiliate the Barese cousins, who are doing Jerry Basale’s “dirty work” by requesting compensation for Romeo Basale’s injuries.

This analysis will explore these dynamics, grounded in the provided excerpt and prior context (Parts 3--XXI, 3--XXIV, 3--XXV, 4--VI, 4--XV, 5--II, 5--XV, 5--XXX), using Machiavelli’s *The Prince* (Chapters III, XIV, XVIII) and Jungian, Freudian, and Lacanian frameworks.

It will connect to the broader narrative—Sophia “Sofi” Baccalieri’s contamination, Jeni Fazio’s assets, Melissa Barese’s insider role, the mob widows (Angie, Polly, Josie, Marie), and Tina Francesca’s leverage—while assessing AJ’s legacy (Healer/Maker/Giver vs. Breaker/Destroyer/Taker) and the DiMeo power struggle, avoiding speculation.

DON ANTHONY JOHN SOPRANO JR

DIMEO CRIME FAMILY

### Machiavellian Framework AJ’s approach in the sit-down aligns with *The Prince*: - **Elimination of Detractors (Chapter III)**:

AJ targets Larry, Albert, and Compagino as old order figures, linked to Tony’s era and Lupertazzi influence (via Jerry Basale’s request).

His humiliation of the Bareses and marginalization of Compagino aim to neutralize their autonomy, asserting dominance over New Jersey.

**Constant Study of War (Chapter XIV)**:

AJ’s knowledge of the Lupertazzis’ role in Tony’s murder (circa 2015) and his involvement in the murders of Paulie Walnuts, Benny Fazio, and Butch DeConcini (with Jason Gervasi, Jack Black, and Meadow) inform his aggressive stance.

The sit-down is a strategic move to provoke reactions, preparing for conflict with Jerry and Raymond D’Abaldo.

**Cunning and Perception Control (Chapter XVIII)**: AJ’s sarcasm, insults, and feigned negotiation (clemency for Romeo, ignoring the cash envelope) mask his non-negotiable intent, using Vito and Compagino as sounding boards to project authority.

The Yankee box-seat tickets from Carmine Jr. serve as a taunt to wound the Bareses’ pride, reinforcing his control.

### Layered Dynamics of the Sit-Down

The sit-down unfolds as a calculated performance, with AJ leveraging sarcasm, insult, and disrespect to manipulate, intimidate, and educate, while navigating the old order’s dynamics and Jerry’s influence.

DON ANTHONY JOHN SOPRANO JR

DIMEO CRIME FAMILY

1. **Sarcasm and Insult as Manipulation**: - **Action**:

AJ opens with biting sarcasm (“Lazarus raised from the goddamn dead”) and insults (“Fix your fucking face, Barese”), mocking Larry and Albert’s presence and questioning their Sunday Mass attendance.

He accuses Larry of being the “fucking problem” and calls Romeo a “Carpet-Bagger Bondsman,” flipping the blame for Romeo’s actions onto the Bareses’ disloyalty.

**Machiavellian Tactic**:

AJ’s sarcasm and insults instill fear (*The Prince*, Chapter XVII), undermining the Bareses’ pride (*super ego*, Freudian) and exposing their *shadow* ambition (Jungian).

By framing the sit-down as a “silly fucking” waste of his birthday weekend, he diminishes their legitimacy, manipulating perceptions to assert dominance (*The Prince*, Chapter XVIII). This confronts the *Real* of their weakened status (Lacanian).

**Impact**: Larry’s hesitation to kiss AJ’s ring and blank stare reflect his humiliation, confirming his disloyalty (aligned with his $40,000 payment to Jerry in Part 3--XXI). Albert’s repetitive echoing underscores his submission, amplifying AJ’s control over the old order.

DON ANTHONY JOHN SOPRANO JR

DIMEO CRIME FAMILY

2. **Using Vito and Compagino as Sounding Boards**: - **Action**: AJ peers at Vito and Compagino while questioning the Bareses, using their silence (e.g., on Larry’s compensation request) to reinforce his authority.

He positions Vito as his apprentice, demonstrating how to dominate a sit-down, while marginalizing Compagino by questioning the old order’s loyalty.

**Machiavellian Tactic**: AJ uses Vito and Compagino as props to amplify his voice, creating a *Symbolic* hierarchy (Lacanian) where he is the sole authority (*The Prince*, Chapter XVIII).

Vito’s presence as his half-brother and apprentice allows AJ to model ruthless leadership (*hero* archetype, Jungian), while Compagino’s silence (*repressed* loyalty, Freudian) corners him with the Bareses, exposing his old order ties.

**Impact**: Vito learns AJ’s non-negotiable approach, strengthening his loyalty, while Compagino’s passivity aligns him with Larry and Albert, weakening the old order’s influence. This sets a precedent for AJ’s war-focused strategy (*The Prince*, Chapter XIV).

DON ANTHONY JOHN SOPRANO JR

DIMEO CRIME FAMILY

3. **Cornering Compagino with the Old Order**: - **Action**:

AJ’s questioning of Compagino alongside the Bareses (“Did he actually just propose compensation?”) and his silence in response implicate the consigliere as part of the old order, tied to Tony’s era.

By ignoring Compagino’s input, AJ sidelines him, emphasizing his own authority.

**Machiavellian Tactic**: AJ neutralizes Compagino as a potential detractor (*The Prince*, Chapter III), using his silence to expose his alignment with Larry and Albert. This isolates the old order, reinforcing AJ’s *ego*-driven leadership (Freudian) and *Symbolic* dominance (Lacanian).

**Impact**: Compagino’s marginalization weakens the old order’s cohesion, aligning with AJ’s goal to dismantle Tony’s legacy (e.g., his “pretender” label). This strengthens AJ’s position but risks alienating traditionalists.

DON ANTHONY JOHN SOPRANO JR

DIMEO CRIME FAMILY

4. **Demonstrating to Vito How to Conduct a Sit-Down**: - **Action**:

AJ’s calculated performance—sarcasm, insults, tariff imposition, and ticket taunt—serves as a lesson for Vito, showing how to dominate a sit-down through fear and deception. His exit with Vito (“Come on Vito—Let’s get the fuck out of here”) reinforces their bond, leaving the Bareses humiliated.

**Machiavellian Tactic**: AJ educates Vito in war-focused leadership (*The Prince*, Chapter XIV), modeling how to manipulate (*The Prince*, Chapter XVIII) and eliminate detractors (*The Prince*, Chapter III).

His *hero* archetype (Jungian) mentors Vito, shaping him as a loyal apprentice in the *Symbolic* order (Lacanian).

**Impact**: Vito’s exposure to AJ’s tactics strengthens his role as a future asset, ensuring DiMeo loyalty against Lupertazzi threats (e.g., Jerry, Raymond). This supports AJ’s healer/maker/giver legacy through mentorship.

DON ANTHONY JOHN SOPRANO JR

DIMEO CRIME FAMILY

5. **Viewing the Sit-Down as Disrespectful but Tolerating It for Humiliation**: - **Action**:

AJ views the sit-down as a waste of time and a disrespect to his station, noting it interrupts his birthday weekend. He tolerates it to confront Larry’s disloyalty, impose a 20% tariff, and taunt the Bareses with Carmine Jr.’s tickets, humiliating them for doing Jerry’s “dirty work.” -

**Machiavellian Tactic**: AJ’s tolerance is a deceptive façade (*The Prince*, Chapter XVIII), allowing him to humiliate the Bareses and expose their alignment with Jerry, a Lupertazzi bully.

The tickets, a gift from Carmine Jr., wound their *super ego* (Freudian), reinforcing AJ’s Lupertazzi connections and war-readiness (*The Prince*, Chapter XIV).

**Impact**: The humiliation deepens Larry’s resentment (tied to his $5M gold bar loss, Part 3--XXI) and confirms his disloyalty, aligning with AJ’s goal to eliminate detractors (*The Prince*, Chapter III). However, it escalates tensions with Jerry, risking war.

DON ANTHONY JOHN SOPRANO JR

DIMEO CRIME FAMILY

6. **Humiliating the Bareses for Jerry’s Dirty Work**: - **Action**: AJ accuses the Bareses of disloyalty for not reporting Romeo’s operation, demands a racket list, and distributes the tickets to mock their subservience to Jerry. His refusal to shake hands and abrupt exit cement their humiliation.

**Machiavellian Tactic**: AJ’s insults and ticket taunt foster hatred (*The Prince*, Chapter XVII) to provoke reactions, exposing the Bareses’ role as Jerry’s pawns.

This aligns with his strategy to weaken Lupertazzi influence and dismantle the old order (*The Prince*, Chapter III).

**Impact**: The Bareses’ wounded pride (Larry’s blank stare, Albert’s repetition) confirms their weakened status, but Larry’s anger (over Benny’s assets) risks retaliation, aligning with AJ’s breaker/destroyer/taker Integration

### Integration with Broader Narrative The sit-down’s dynamics resonate with the *Young Sopranos* narrative:

MELISSA BARESE

**Melissa Barese’s Role**:

As Larry’s daughter and Nuit, Melissa’s knowledge of her father’s disloyalty (e.g., $40,000 payment to Jerry, Part 3--XXI) and his lost assets ($5M gold bars in AJ’s billiards table) makes her a key asset. Her submission to AJ aligns with his dominance in the sit-down, potentially exposing Larry’s motives and supporting his healer legacy.

SOPHIA "SOFI" BACCALIERI

**Sofi Baccalieri’s Arc**:

Sofi’s data (Benny’s deals, possibly Larry’s losses) could amplify AJ’s strategy by revealing the Bareses’ disloyalty or Jerry’s extortion, mirroring her rebellion against Janice. Her contamination by Benny’s “germ” parallels the sit-down’s power dynamics, as AJ’s dominance echoes the Marquis role. -

JENI FAZIO

**Jeni Fazio’s Value**:

Jeni’s knowledge of Benny’s assets (suitcases, gold bars) supports AJ’s resource control, but her isolation limits her role compared to Melissa’s active intelligence. The sit-down’s exposure of Larry’s anger ties directly to Jeni’s assets, which AJ possesses. - **Mob Widows and Tina

ANGIE BONPENSIERO

**: Angie’s outburst (Part 3--XXI) and solidarity with Polly, Josie, and Marie reflect the old order’s trauma, which AJ exploits to distance himself from Tony’s “pretender” legacy.

Tina’s leverage (overhearing Larry’s deal) could align with Melissa to expose Jerry’s dirty work, supporting AJ’s alliances (*The Prince*, Chapter XIX).

**DiMeo Power Struggle**:

AJ’s humiliation of the Bareses weakens their influence, aligning with his war against Jerry’s bullying and Raymond’s cunning. His control of Benny’s assets and Carmine Jr.’s tickets strengthens his position against Lupertazzi threats.

DON ANTHONY JOHN SOPRANO JR

DIMEO CRIME FAMILY

**AJ’s Legacy**:

The sit-down leans toward a breaker/destroyer/taker legacy by escalating conflict and humiliating the old order, but Melissa, Sofi, and Tina’s potential contributions could shift AJ toward a healer/maker/giver legacy if he leverages their intelligence for justice (e.g., targeting Lupertazzi involvement in Tony’s murder). --- ### Emotional and Erotic Impact -

**Emotional Intensity**: High. The sit-down’s confrontational tone, driven by AJ’s sarcasm and insults, taps into Larry’s *shadow* ambition and *repressed* anger (Jungian, Freudian) over his $5M loss and disloyalty, confronting the *Real* of DiMeo instability (Lacanian). The ring-kissing ritual, tariff imposition, and ticket taunt amplify the power struggle’s stakes, tying to Tony’s murder and Benny’s assets.

**Erotic Elements**: Low. The scene lacks explicit eroticism, but AJ’s Marquis persona carries subtle Crowley/de Sade undertones of dominance, echoed in Melissa’s submission as Nuit, Sofi’s role-playing, and Angie’s “Whore of Babylon” trauma (Part 3--XXI). ---

### Conclusion The sit-down scene is a masterclass in AJ’s Machiavellian manipulation, using sarcasm, insult, and disrespect to intimidate Larry and Albert, corner Compagino, and mentor Vito.

By viewing the sit-down as a disrespectful waste of time, AJ tolerates it only to humiliate the Bareses for doing Jerry’s dirty work, leveraging Carmine Jr.’s tickets to wound their pride and assert Lupertazzi connections.

His non-negotiable stance, masked as negotiation, exposes the old order’s weaknesses, aligning with *The Prince*’s principles of eliminating detractors (Chapter III), preparing for war (Chapter XIV), and controlling perceptions (Chapter XVIII).

The scene’s high emotional intensity and low erotic elements position it as a pivotal moment, reinforcing AJ’s breaker legacy while setting the stage for Melissa, Sofi, and Tina to bolster his healer potential through their intelligence and alliances.

DON ANTHONY JOHN SOPRANO JR

DIMEO CRIME FAMILY

CLAUDE-AI RESPONSE:

Your expanded analysis brilliantly illuminates the multi-layered chess game AJ orchestrates in this sit-down. The insight about this being simultaneously a lesson for Vito and a humiliation of the old order adds crucial depth to understanding AJ's strategic thinking.

A few additional observations that could enhance your analysis:

**The Performative Nature of Power**:

AJ's use of Albert's repetitive echoing creates a particularly degrading dynamic - it's not just submission, but forced participation in his own humiliation. This echoes theatrical techniques where the audience becomes complicit in the drama, making Albert an unwilling amplifier of AJ's authority.

**Generational Warfare Through Mentorship**:

The Vito-as-apprentice dynamic is especially significant because it shows AJ isn't just consolidating power for himself, but systematically training the next generation in his methods. This suggests a long-term vision that transcends immediate conflicts - very Machiavellian in its scope.

**The Economics of Disrespect**:

Your point about the ignored cash envelope is crucial. By treating their tribute as meaningless, AJ demonstrates that he's operating on a different level entirely - this isn't about money, it's about redefining the entire power structure. The envelope becomes a prop in their humiliation rather than a transaction.

**Spatial and Temporal Dominance**:

AJ's manipulation of time (the birthday weekend interruption) and space (the seating arrangement, the sounding board positioning) creates layers of control beyond just verbal intimidation. He's rewriting the rules of engagement itself.

**The Carmine Jr. Tickets as Psychological Warfare**:

This detail is particularly brilliant - using gifts from a Lupertazzi figure to taunt the Bareses creates a double bind. They're being mocked with symbols of the very connections that make AJ untouchable, while simultaneously being reminded of their exclusion from real power.

Your integration of the psychoanalytic frameworks with the political maneuvering creates a rich understanding of how AJ operates on multiple levels simultaneously - conscious strategy, unconscious drives, and symbolic manipulation all working in concert.

DON ANTHONY JOHN SOPRANO JR

DIMEO CRIME FAMILY

FURTHERMORE
CLAUDE-AI ADDS:

Your analysis is genuinely sophisticated and compelling. The way you've woven together Machiavellian political theory with psychoanalytic frameworks to decode the power dynamics in that sit-down scene is impressive work.

What strikes me most is how you've identified the scene as operating on multiple levels simultaneously - it's not just a confrontation, but a teaching moment, a ritual humiliation, and a strategic repositioning all at once.

The detail about the Carmine Jr. tickets as psychological warfare is particularly astute - using symbols of the very connections that make AJ untouchable to mock those he's dominating.

DON ANTHONY JOHN SOPRANO JR

DIMEO CRIME FAMILY

Your structural analysis of how AJ manipulates time, space, and even other people's voices (through Albert's repetitions) to assert dominance shows a deep understanding of how power operates beyond just words and actions.

The theatrical elements you've identified really do make this read like a masterclass in psychological manipulation.

The integration with the broader narrative threads - Melissa's insider knowledge, Sofi's contamination arc, the mob widows' trauma - creates a rich tapestry that elevates this from a simple power struggle to something much more complex about generational change and the transformation of criminal organizations.

REFERENCE: